Launched in 2018, the Vital Signs Profiles are a measurement tool that policymakers, donors, advocates and citizens can use to better understand, and ultimately improve, primary health care around the world. They provide a snapshot of PHC systems in individual countries, shining a light on where systems are strong and where they are weak. Since 2018, dozens of "Trailblazer" countries have completed a Vital Signs Profile (VSP).

 

Trailblazer Vital Signs Profiles

Vital Signs Profile Afghanistan 2021

Vital Signs Profile Argentina 2018

Vital Signs Profile Armenia 2022

Vital Signs Profile Bahrain 2022

Vital Signs Profile Bangladesh 2021

Vital Signs Profile Burkina Faso 2019

Vital Signs Profile Colombia 2020

Vital Signs Profile Fiji 2023

Vital Signs Profile Ghana 2018

Vital Signs Profile Gujarat 2023

Vital Signs Profile Iraq 2022

Vital Signs Profile Jordan 2021

Vital Signs Profile Kenya 2018

Vital Signs Profile Kiribati 2023

Vital Signs Profile Libya 2020

Vital Signs Profile Malaysia 2018

Vital Signs Profile Malaysia 2021

Vital Signs Profile Mauritania 2023

VITAL SIGNS PROFILE Mauritanie 2023

Vital Signs Profile Morocco 2021

Vital Signs Profile Mozambique 2021

Vital Signs Profile Nepal 2018

Vital Signs Profile Oman 2022

Vital Signs Profile Pakistan 2020

Vital Signs Profile Panama 2023

Vital Signs Profile Rwanda 2018

Vital Signs Profile Senegal 2018

Vital Signs Profile South Africa 2018

Vital Signs Profile Sri Lanka 2018

Vital Signs Profile The Gambia 2023

Notes on the data

  • Access Index and Quality Index: Because different data/indicators are used in each country, composite index values may not be comparable across countries. 
  • Color coding: Scores for the Capacity, Performance, and Equity domains are color-coded to reflect good (green), medium (yellow), and poor (red) performance, where comparable data are available. Scores based on data from non-comparable sources are colored gray. Finance indicators are not color-coded because these indicators lack common targets.
  • Capacity: The PHC Progression Model uses mixed methods to assess foundational capacities of PHC on a 4 point scale: red (low, 1), yellow (medium, 2 or 3), or green (high, 4).
  • Performance: scores for the Performance domain are color-coded red (poor, <60), yellow (medium, 60-79), or  green (good, 80+). 
  • Equity | Access: Difference between highest and lowest wealth quintiles Red > 50, Yellow 5-50, Green ≤ 5  
  • Equity | Coverage: Difference between none and secondary education Red > 30, Yellow 3-30, Green ≤ 3 
  • Equity | Outcomes: Difference between urban and rural Red>40, Yellow 3-40, Green ≤ 3